ncethat says that the executivehim/herself makes missing thesigns likely.

"misinterpreting ones" is also wrong. thisshould be "them", not "ones".

这个B相当有迷惑性啊啊啊！但是后来仔细一看，B想表达的意思居然居然是An executive  makes missing signs of incipient trouble or misinterpreting ones likely when they do appear
后面的D也犯了这个错误。

C。An executive who is heavily committed to a course of action is likely to missor misinterpret signs of incipient trouble when they do appear, especially ifit has worked well in the past.

'it' is ambiguous, becauseit could potentially refer either to 'course of action' (the intendedantecedent) or to 'incipient trouble'. also note that grammatical parallelismdoesn't help: both of those possible antecedents areobjects of prepositions - neither is the subject of its own clause (which wouldthereby create parallelism with 'it', which is the subject of its clause).

(D)Executives’ being heavily committed to a course of action, especially if it hasworked well in the past, makes them likely to miss signs of incipient troubleor misinterpreting them when they do appear.

Misinterpreting should be an infinitive verb form to parallel miss; thephrasing throughout the sentence is wordy and awkward.

所以说，你艰难的排除了四个不靠谱的选型以后，只剩下了E.Beingheavily committed to a course of action, especially one that has worked well inthe past, is likely to make an executive miss signs of incipient trouble ormisinterpret them when they do appear.
这个句子真的是好不清纯好做作，看上去就和外面的妖艳贱货一样呢！

但没办法！这就是正确的选项！

首先，句子表意正确，指代正确，没有语法错误！

特别注意，在这里Being heavily committed to a course of action就相当于整个句子的主语，将句子主谓连起来Being heavily committed to a course of actionis likely to …………灰常完整，虽然看起来很变扭！

所以，根据RON大神总结~~~（敲黑板）

1.being被唯一排除的情况就是：

you should avoid "being"when expressing the IDENTITY or CHARACTERISTICS of some individual or thing. 在描述一个人或者一个事物的时候，用到的being就是冗余，就是错误选项！

this is because "being" isusually unnecessary in such cases; there are simpler modifiers (such asappositives) that, while absolutely impossible to use in spoken language, arebetter in written language.

example:

being a cigar aficionado, john has strongopinions on when to use single-guillotine cigar cutters rather thandouble-guillotine cutters. -->bad.

a cigar aficionado, john has strong opinionson when to use single-guillotine cigar cutters rather than double-guillotinecutters. --> good. noticethat we can simply omit the "being" here.

2.在你不造含有being的选项是否正确的时候，你尝试着省略being，看看句子是否可行，意思是否发生改变。（ try omitting it and see whether the sentence is still viable, perhaps with minor modifications.）在E这里，省略掉being以后，整个句子变成：

Heavilycommitted to a course of action, especially one that has worked well in thepast, is likely to make an execu