作为考了4次gmat的渣滓，就不分享其他的心得了，但是作文上真的楼主悟出了一些特别有效率的方法，大大节省备考时间。说考gmat不辛苦的基本上都是神了，但是辛苦归辛苦，我们要把力气用在刀刃上。因此楼主特别附上原汁原味当时考场上自己亲手打的满分6分作文！！！source来源：自己的电子成绩单哈哈
首先先说明一下楼主的语言背景：
211 国贸 雅思7.5 作文：6.5 （作文无任何培训班 就自己考前一星期练习了几下就上考场了的，也不是很好但是就那么短时间也就将就了）
第一次考g 作文随便打打4分，第二、三次取消了，第四次意外收获6分
废话不多说，赶紧上最最重要的正题：
gmat满分关键点：
1. 提高速度：练反应思考速度，打字速度
2. 基础：有一定语言功底
3. 限时练习：把每个月的寂静拿来练（根据我4次月考的经验，几乎每个月都是一样的题目）
具体执行步骤和原文：
1. 所谓的模板，并不是全文的模板，而仅仅只是开头段和结尾段自己的模板，这样每次写作文就能套用。
2.复习无聊时多看时事新闻，它能增加你对案例的分析能力，说不定还能用到例子，在例子里举上一两个具体的时事例子，必定能大大加分！
3.多练作文机经：并不是全篇打出来，偶尔限时打几篇就行，但是一定要考前一周天天练点，所谓练点就是把文章里要抨击的点都列出来，再对照机经，看自己还缺哪些方面。
3.看七宗罪（百度随便搜搜就有），很有用，不需花太多时间，就理解一下每种逻辑缺陷大概有哪些，就够！
4.沿用之前一个cd上的大牛的方法：
每个句子开头：单独列三个点，你会发现三个点都重复了，无非就是想说这些点没关系
但是如果你用even if开头，就可以把原来的那个点肯定了，再来说新的，这样辩论力就大大加强！！！
噔噔噔！！！请具体参照楼主自己的6分满分原文。（考试后出的电子成绩单上发现的，真的是100%原汁原味考场发挥，无任何更改的！）
Read the argument and the instructions that follow it, and then make any notes that will help you plan your response.
Begin typing your response in the box at the bottom of the screen. The following appeared in a brochure from
IntelliTrain, a company that helps corporations develop interactive online self-training programs for their employees:
“You’ve just hired a new employee, but that new employee is far from ready to contribute to your company. Every hour
spent training this employee is an hour of lost productivity, both for the new employee and for the experienced
employee doing the training. Our interactive online programs allow new employees to train themselves. This makes
training more efficient and reduces the number of workforce hours devoted to training, resulting in a new employee
who is better prepared to contribute effectively to your business. Furthermore, the cost of the training programs will
be more than offset by the money saved in reducing workforce hours currently devoted to training. Purchasing our
online self-training programs will help your corporation reduce costs and increase profitability.” Discuss ...
The author cites that fact that a new employee needs to be trained before they work, so an on-line training program
will be recommanded by this company to help the company save training costs. To support this argument, the author
provides the evidence that the face-to-face training will cost a lot compared with the on-line one. This argument
sounds somewhat convincing, but after a quick but careful analysis, it is problematic in three aspects.
Firstly, the promoting company fails to take the costs of purchasing the on-line software into consideration. This
argument just oversimplifies the cost of the software purchasing by thinking that the face-to-face training will cost a lot
from both the experienced employees and new ones. However, this is not the case. Learning the personal training
from the experienced employees, the new employees can maximize their involvements in the program and can obtain
the first-hand experiences from them. For example, Alibaba pays almost 10% of their annual expenses on employees
training by sending them out to overseas to learn the lastest knowledge and skills. If Alibaba simply offered the
on-line training, there is not enough interaction for its employees to improve their skills timely and combine with their
real experience in the real world.
Secondly, even if the costs of the purchasing are affordable, not every employee is necessary to be fully trained. The
program also commits a fallacy that all of the new employees need to be trained on-line equally. However, if there are
some new employees who are experienced in the same industry for couple years, but they just new to the company, it
is not necessary to train them fully on-line.
On the contrary, they just need some proper training of the company and get better prepared. Moreover, some
positions are not required to be trained on-line, such as the cleaners and so on. If the company just thinks everyone
needs to be trained on-line and more costs will be wasted on unnecessary purchasing of the programs. Therefore, if
the company can clearly classify the groups of employees that need on-line training, more costs will be saved.
Thirdly, even if the costs can be saved from training, it does not guarantee that the profitability will increase. The
argument fails to claim that how much percent of costs that training takes up and it also omits the sales of the
company which also has significant influence on the profits. For example, if the cost budgets of training just merely
takes up a small amount of the total costs, there is no reason for the company to spend so much money to purchase
the on-line program. Moreover, if sales of the company still keep the same or drop down due to the inefficent
management structures, wrong developing strategies, the profits will undoubtedly drop. Without taking other factors
into consideration, it is imprudent forthe author to promise that the purchase of the on-line software will increase the
company's profits.
Overall, the arugment omits some very significant factors that should have been taken into consideration, so it is
neither convincing nor persuasive. To bolster the conclusion, more evidences should be provided in the arugument.
Only by doing this can the argument be more compelling and logical.
最后，祝大家寻梦成功！！楼主已收到queen‘s 皇后大学 master of international business 和sfu的offer master of finance.正在苦恼选哪个，希望大家能给出个建议，投个票，小女子不胜感激：
https://forum.chasedream.com/thread-950412-1-1.html
最后特别喜欢一句话：
所有的结果都是最好的，如果不是，那就一定不是终点。
--------------------------------------
原文引自：
https://forum.chasedream.com/thread-950468-1-1.html
参与讨论及查看更多的相关文章请访问【GMAT AWA写作专区】
https://forum.chasedream.com/forum-26-1.html
京公网安备11010202008513号